On 10 August 2016, the Government published a consultation paper on the taxation of Settlement Agreements. The snappily titled “Simplification of the tax and National Insurance treatment of termination payments: government response and consultation on draft legislation” is taking responses until 5 October 2016.
So why are we having the consultation and what is the likely outcome?
Presently, if a company exits an employee via a Settlement Agreement, there are various mechanisms which allow any monies passing between the parties to be paid in a tax efficient way. In particular: –
In practice, this means that where a Settlement Agreement is entered into there is often a debate (argument!) between respective lawyers about which payments are taxable and which aren’t. It also creates a slightly odd scenario where you could have two colleagues leaving a company in exactly the same way but one gets more money because of the absence of a clause in their employment contract. Naturally, it also means that less money is paid in tax to the HRMC.
The Government has launched a consultation paper about changing the current position. This follows previous consultation around the same issue.
In particular it is proposed that: –
The Government’s primary concern, which is well founded, is that the current system is complicated and is open to manipulation by employers and indeed employees. It is certain that there will be some changes following this consultation. Whilst not ideal for all (particularly those without PILON clauses!) it will simplify the current position which, as the title of the consultation makes clear, is part of the plan in any event.
(Williams v Leeds United Football Club) Mr Williams was employed as a Technical Director by Leeds United Football Club (the club) from August 2006 until his summary dismissal for gross misconduct on 30 July…Continue reading