At present there is a growth in regulatory activity
concerning ideas of environmental, social and corporate change, which are
having an impact on the residential property market. The idea of wellbeing and “well buildings” is
already well-established in commercial property sectors and is now emerging as
an influence in the residential property sector.
There is significant debate as to what “wellbeing” means for residences. Different business models are incorporating this approach as part of their wider application of environmental, social and corporate governance in various different ways. The emergence of the build-to-rent (BTR) asset class has also had an impact as consumers are increasingly expecting properties to offer an experience in addition to providing a roof under which to live. The increase of BTR residential property schemes means that more developments are incorporating amenities and services, such as community areas, fitness centres and communal gardens. Many also incorporate environmental features such as electronic car charging points. The changes in the approach to developments are also reflective of the broader developments around social responsibility, corporate citizenship and better engagement with stakeholders, consumers and workforces.
Wellbeing and social impact are clearly buzz words in the private development industry at present. This shift is raising some difficult questions for an industry who has historically focussed more on what they build rather than the people that they house. With social and environmental impact high on the agenda at the moment, the real estate sector needs to pay attention to this and increase focus on their impact on the communities in which they work.
In response to this shift, investors, developers and
residence representational bodies are taking steps to define standards and
regulations to ensure wellbeing in property developments. This may include a wide range of features
including consideration of noise, privacy, transport, accessibility and community
facilities. These all have an impact on
the design of a development, along with environmental factors, such as air
quality and biodiversity. In some areas,
environmental impact assessments have fallen out of fashion but are rapidly
being taken up again to meet this increase in demand from society.
UK legislation is also playing a part. On 15 October 2019, the Environment Bill was
introduced. It’s progress stalled with the dissolution of parliament. However,
it is a good indicator of the type of legislation that might be expected in
future. The bill outlined a mandatory
biodiversity net-gain regime, that would require developers to ensure that new
developments have a positive overall effect on biodiversity. The Bill also sought to enhance the duty on
public authorities to encourage biodiversity.
It is also notable that s172 of
the Companies Act 2006 requires that for periods commencing 1 January 2019, those companies of a size
that are required to produce a strategic report must now include a statement
explaining how the directors have had regard to the matters in s172.Whilst
there is no set structure for the statement, guidance on what may need to be
included to meet the Companies Act requirement is available in the FRC’s
Guidance on the Strategic Report. Section 172 deals with the directors’ duty to
promote the success of the company for the benefit of shareholders as a whole
and having regard to a number of broader matters including the likely
consequence of decisions for the long term. Therefore, they need to demonstrate
consideration of impact beyond the immediate stakeholders in their business and
consider their impact on a wider basis.
It is also notable that in 2018 the Government placed
wellbeing at the heart of its strategic 25-year environmental plan which
focussed on the “health” of the natural world and people. It also highlighted the importance of access
to green spaces for physical and mental wellbeing. This followed on from the Clean Growth
Strategy issued in 2017, which set out how new homes could contribute to a
lower carbon future.
The property industry is starting to develop ways of
measuring wellbeing, which include physical and mental health, as well as
social wellbeing. This is a difficult
area as surveys of residents can establish only what a particular individual or
community think are priorities to make them happy. This may not always correlate with factors
that studies have identified as the best ways to engender wellbeing.
In November 2018, the Build Better, Build Beautiful
Commission was established to promote better design of homes and living
areas. They published their first report
in July 2019 setting out eight areas of reform for local and national
government. That report suggested that
wellbeing-related ideas should become a goal for the UK Planning system
alongside sustainable development as part of the National Planning Policy
The recommendations set out proposals that development
should create places, not just homes. It
is a bold ambition but there is no reason that sustainability and aesthetically
pleasing design cannot co-exist. Part of
the sustainability of a place or buildings is that it contains beauty in order
to stand the test of time.
Many organisations are now offering wellbeing accreditation. For developers, this can lift standards and
contribute to operational excellence.
The addition of wellbeing standards can enhance their brand, their
standing in the market and their attractiveness to stakeholders, investors and
“Doing the right thing” is also in itself a compelling
investment proposition. Investors are
attracted to wellbeing-orientated projects as they are shown to retain and
attract residents, generating uninterrupted revenue streams.
The rate at which there is new legislative and regulatory
activity in this area, would suggest that the trend towards wellbeing as a
priority is not passing. Therefore,
developers would be well advised to ensure that this emerging initiative
remains at the centre of their thinking and plans, not least to future proof